It is easy to dismiss these public-sector innovators as jargon-spouting irrelevancies. With America's federal government spending almost $4 trillion a year, it may not be obvious what difference a few reformers in mayors' offices in Boston or New York can make. Bureaucracies are designed to kill innovation in the name of predictability, and political variations can reverse sensible changes. For example, many of the reforms that New York's mayor Mr. Bloomberg implemented were undone by his successor. Politicians can also sometimes treat the mere existence of innovation centers as justification for carrying on with established practices in many areas of government. What is more, such centers spend a lot of time making minor improvements in situations where major policy reviews are required. It is admirable that France's Experimental Fund for Youth provides young people with driving licenses at reduced cost. It would be better if the government changed the rules that make getting a license in France such a lengthy and expensive nightmare.
📝 题目要求
找出文本中的逻辑关系词,并写出对应的逻辑类型
找出文本中的逻辑关系词；并写出所对应的逻辑类型：
:
:
:
:
:
:
✅ 参考答案与解析
1. and：并列 2. For example：举例 3. also：递进 4. What is more：递进 5. if：条件 1. and：并列关系。共同说明公共部门改革面临的阻碍。 2. For example：举例关系。来具体说明前面提到的 “政治变化会逆转合理的改革” 这一观点 3. also：递进关系。 进一步说明政治家有时还会把创新中心的存在当作在政府许多领域继续沿用既定做法的理由 4. What is more：递进关系。 进一步指出这些创新中心在很多需要重大政策审查的情况下却花大量时间进行微小改进 5. if：条件关系（假设条件下的比较关系）。 通过假设条件提出更好的改进方向